Wednesday, April 20, 2011

When Will They Stop Calling it Obama-Care?

The mainstream liberal press coined what it hoped would be the derisive term 'Reaganomics' when it first encountered Reagan economic policy.   But as Reagan later said,  "I could tell our economic policy was working, when they stopped calling it 'Reaganomics.'"
 
Likewise the term 'Obama-Care' was coined by the liberal press, but in this case to pay tribute to the man who finally put a "successful" National Health Care plan on the map.   According to Larry Elder,
 
A LexisNexis search turns up what might be "ObamaCare's" first use in print. An April 4, 2008, enthusiastically supportive article in the Salt Lake Tribune said: "Obama's national health insurance program, let's call it 'ObamaCare,' provides Americans with affordable premiums, co-pays and deductibles."

Unfortunately for Obama the term quickly became a derisive term.  Why?, because it was seen for what it is-- a stupid, wasteful, counterproductive policy.  

Will we be able to tell that Obama Care is working when they stop calling it Obama-Care?   Well don't hold your breath.

Best Wishes,

Bernie 

Why Public Sector Unions Must Go

In a perceptive article, Jonah Goldberg indicates that the actions in Wisconsin to reign in unions  don't go far enough.
 
While union supporters charge that Wisconsin Governor, Scott Walker is engaging in "union busting" Goldberg says, "If only".
 
So what about public sector unions
 
Well here are some facts highlighted in the article:
 
* Public Sector Unions were illegal until 1962 when John Kennedy lifted their ban by Executive fiat.
 
* Civil servants were making decent salaries and encountered generally good working conditions before that time.  And of course in 1962 public service employees were not marching for better working conditions.  They weren't getting black lung from their water cooler breaks, or mesotheleoma from shuffling papers at their desks.
 
* The main impetus for allowing public service unions to bargain collectively is that it harnessed the political allegiance of public workers, via their unions to the Democrat Party-- a perpetual feed back loop of  worker support and money given by politicians to unions in exchange for financial and political support for the party--- and all conveniently paid with taxpayer dollars. **see Michael Barone quote below 
 
* Unfortunately  this political feedback loop allows public sector unions to by-pass the public interest in getting the most for its taxpayer dollars, thus subverting the protection of property which should be government's first concern.
 
* Over the long term, and especially during fiscal crisis, the "generosity" of liberal Democratic union patrons, dishing out someone else's money has created fiscal insolvency in several of our states.
 
But here's the good news for Ohio---- our Senate Bill #5 goes further than the Wisconsin Proposals.
 
Here's what another perceptive commentator had to say....
 
Government unions have nothing in common with private sector unions because they don't have hostile management on the other side of the bargaining table. To the contrary, the "bosses" of government employees are co-conspirators with them in bilking the taxpayers.
Far from being careful stewards of the taxpayers' money, politicians are on the same side of the bargaining table as government employees -- against the taxpayers, who aren't allowed to be part of the negotiation. This is why the head of New York's largest public union in the mid-'70s, Victor Gotbaum, gloated, "We have the ability to elect our own boss."   
 
Click the article below:  
 
 
Best Wishes,
 
Bernie
 
** Michael Baron Reports on Obama: Obama said Governor Walker was waging "an assault on unions and added that "public employee unions make enormous contributions to our states and our citizens."
 
Enormous contributions, yes -- to the Democratic Party and the Obama campaign. Unions, most of whose members are public employees, gave Democrats some $400 million in the 2008 election cycle. The American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, the biggest public employee union, gave Democrats $90 million in the 2010 cycle.

Ohio's Senate Bill #5 and Merit

The first, and perhaps main provision of Ohio's Senate Bill #5 -- click below to see-- is to install and instill the principle that pay should not be merely a function of years of service, but also of effectiveness.
 
 
In other words, pay should be, even in the public sector, based on merit.   That isn't the case now.  Instead, everyone is treated with dreary socialist uniformity.
 
What do you mean Iven?  Can you give us an example?  
 
Sure, when I taught at Whitehall Schools, here in the Columbus area,  I was looking forward to my second year teaching social studies at the high school.   The second year is a wonderful time, because you can take your notes and lessons, and rather than starting from scratch, you have the opportunity tweak and craft your lessons to be even more effective.  
 
It was during a contemplation of my second year that I received news that I no longer had a job at the high school. 
 
Had I performed so poorly during my first year that they were letting me go?  Of course not, union rules mean that you'd have to do something disgustingly stupid to actually get fired as a teacher.  Even incompetence doesn't cut it.  Besides, while I was certainly not a master teacher, I was well liked by students and well-regarded by my peers.
 
So what had happened?   Well it seems, that due to declining enrollment, the one of the two gym teacher positions was being eliminated.   So which gym teacher was to be eliminated?   Not necesarily the least effective of the two, but the one who had the least seniority.   That's how it works.   Well it turns out that this eliminated gym teacher, who had 11 more years of service than I,  also had a college minor in social studies. 
 
True, he hadn't studied social studies for 12 or more years.   True, he had never taught social studies.  True, he would have rather kept a postion in phys ed. True, he had only a bachelors in the subject of social studies while I had a masters.  True, he had only minored in the subject, whereas it was the central focus of my studies.   Still, he had seniority and so the job was his.  
 
I was as they call it "bumped" from my job.  
 
Now I have no animus toward the gym teacher.  I suppose he was doing what he felt he had to do... and as luck would have it, a position opened at the middle school the next year.   Still, I ask you, was this the best move for the kids?   Of course not.   But did you think that teacher's unions really care about the kids?   Come on, wake up and smell the faculty lounge coffee.
 
When you do, it will be clear why as the Cato Institute's, Michael Tanner reports, that while federal spending on education has increased 188% since 1970 test scores among students remain abysmal.
 
Best Wishes,
 
Bernie   

Do you have a minute to make a difference?

I wrote a letter to our Ohio State Senate Representative, Kevin Bacon. Have you written your senator too, to urge him/her to support Senate Bill 5?  You can do it quite easily.  
 Feel free to use any of my wording if you'd like, or write yours from scratch.   It will only take a few minutes, but it may be a crucial difference in turning our state toward fiscal responsibility, or keeping it on track to join blue states as their citizens flea to more sane states. 
Write your Senator today!
Best Wishes,
Bernie Iven
-----------------------------
Dear Mr. Bacon,
I just wanted to take a moment to urge you, and encourage you, as you  already are, to support Senate Bill 5 to reform Collective Bargaining
With the state in a fiscal crisis, and 8 billion dollars in debt, it's time the public sector too, made some sacrifices.   Many of their perks and benefits were leveraged by unions seeking concentrated benefits, while the public is unable to react to its disbursed harms.   But those harms add up-- especially during tough economic times.  Also, unions have taken advantage of situations where their liberal allies are in office, and where they can offer to trade votes in exchange for additional benefits.  
It then falls on Conservatives to pay the bills after the liberal politicians are long gone.  Sure, we're willing to stand up and take responsibility We'll have to pay the bills, but it makes sense to put into place systems that restrain the future bills, so that we get our money's worth. The paymaster for the public sector unions are the taxpayers, and as taxpayers we demand that our money is spent responsibly.  We, as the boss, would like to have some slim control over how our money is spent.
Yet unions recklessly ignore our pleas.  They'd rather see the entire state in fiscal turmoil than make the modest adjustments that would save the very jobs of their own membership.   And why should state employees be forced to join unions?   Unions support many causes that the rank and file oppose, and unions dictate uniformity and banal equality on work.  They demean the dignity of work.  To them, it's not how hard you work (or poorly) that determines your pay, it is only how long you've served.  Let's replace this socialist paradigm with a system that tips its hat to merit.  
Then, and only then, will the taxpayers have an efficient public sector work force that earns its keep
Please support Senate Bill 5.
Best Wishes,
Bernie Iven
Columbus Ohio

Safely Home

Here is my review of Safely Home by Randy Alcorn.  
 
It's a great book (fiction, but based on true life) about the persecuted church in China.
 
I highly recommend it.
 
Click here for the review>>>
 

Public Service Unions, Wisconsin, Ohio and the Kos

It's good to know what big government liberals are up to....  I get updates occasionally for Soros funded Move-On.org, the WhiteHouse.gov, the Daily Kos, and Soros' Open Society Institute.  
 
Right now, the Kos is spurring on public sector monopoly unions to storm the Wisconsin State Capital.   It's not that hard to do... because there is the threat that the tax payer funded money spigot might be turned down just a bit.   In contrast, Tea Party crowds, while concerned about the money being taken from them, make their stand on principle.
 
You may know that recently the number of people who are members of public sector unions has exceeded those who are members of private sector unions.   The reason for this is fairly simple.  Public sector unions have a monopoly on the services they provide.   Indeed in most cases private concerns are not even allowed to offer the same services.   So the deal is often, either you pay public sector workers what the union says they want, or you don't get the service. Of course many public service employees work hard and are not even interested in being a part of the union.   Too bad though, they don't get a choice.  That's the way it was when I used to teach.  I was forced to pay dues to the NEA whether I wanted to or not, and even though the NEA was supporting various liberal political causes that I was opposed to.  Meanwhile the NEA representative that taught at the same school as I did spent dozens of days per year on paid leave, and with the district also paying for a substitute so she could attend union meetings that were conveniently scheduled during the middle of school hours.   I bet that made her an especially effective teacher. 
 
Another problem with public service unions is that when they make demands, politicians, especially liberal ones, say sure, we'll pay you that benefit, or this salary, knowing its not their money anyway and that in a few years, they'll be out of office and some other politician down the line will have to pay the bill when it comes due (if he can still afford it).  
 
The result is the kind of ballooning debt that we are seeing now in states like California.  They are bound by contract to pay salaries, but if they do they will also be bankrupt.  Be on the lookout for pleas for blue state bailouts coming soon.  Still, as I understand it, collective bargaining by public sector unions was illegal until 1960.   Why?  Because such unions have a monopoly on the services they provide.  In the private sector, employers and employees set the wage through the market.  If an employee doesn't like the wage, they are free to look elsewhere.   And of course for the employer unwilling to pay a competitive wage, he is loses top notch talent.  So if a deal is struck its generally a win-win.
 
But for state employees it's often win-lose.  The employee wins, because he gets what he wants, but the employer, the taxpayer, loses because he has to pay more then necessary.   Sure, a state employee should have a fair wage, but tax-payers deserve only to pay a fair wage, not an exorbitant one.   And that's why Ohio has recently introduced Senate Bill 5 to eliminate collective bargaining in government jobs.  It's only fair.  If the government wants top notch talent, it will have to pay for it, but it WON'T have to overpay for it. 
 
So see what the liberal Kos has to say.   Kos director, Chris Bowers knocks the Koch brothers, who have indeed donated to Conservative causes (just like Soros has to statist causes), but Kos implies that they own the tea party, even going so far as to put the word "grass roots" in quotations.  Nothing could be further from the truth. Ask 20 tea-partiers who the Koch brothers are and I'd bet you you'd be lucky if even one could tell you.  And that's because in reality the people who finance the tea parties are actually tea partiers.  And that really is grassroots. And the reason the tea partiers rally is because they believe passionately in the great cause known as America.   Meanwhile, the liberals paid to bus people from out of state to the Obama's speech when he came to Columbus.  And last year they paid union activists to stage a counter protest to the one against former liberal representative Mary Jo Kilroy.   Of course the union guys left right on the hour mark after they clocked out.
 
When Obama and the Democrats came to power in 2008 he noted that "elections have consequences" as they went on to force government health care on the country.  But now that the public has come to see what the liberals are really about and turned the tables on Democrats, even at the home of "progressivism"  in Wisconsin in 2010.  Now the big government politicians ignore their own words in the idea that elections have consequences, as all 14 Democratic Senators have fled the state to prevent a quorum from occurring.  All this to thwart the people's will through their representative to get public service employees to accept modest cuts in wages and benefits so that Wisconsin will not be forced over the brink.   
 
In the Obama economy the private sector has had to make many sacrifices and suffered job losses, but the public service unions would rather see the government go into bankruptcy than make even the smallest of sacrifices.
 
But you won't read that in the Kos... To the Kos, these cowardly Senators are heroes.  
Best Wishes,
 
Bernie

Bike Snobs

Here's my review of the book, Bike Snobs.
 
Please click below...
 
 
Best Wishes,
 
Bernie